These were only some of the cultural strives that have occurred in the American society on the account of the various attitudes that people have for and against abortion. The debate over abortion is mostly a cultural and sociological issue and is perhaps the most controversial and the most common cause of the cultural wars that we see going on around us. People give all sorts of reasons that are aimed at justifying abortions while others come up with equally good arguments that present abortion as an evil. Whatever the case may be, it is apparent that human beings have a choice when it comes to making the baby, as they can use contraception etc to deter pregnancy. In all the moral and legal sense, a person is not a person until he/she is born and therefore the parents should be able to make a decision about the baby as they wish. If the parents feel that they are not apt at child rearing and they conceive by mistake, they should be allowed to undergo abortion.
I hope this post has given you some helpful direction on this assignment. I’d approach your assignment as follows:
1. Choose the two articles wisely (assuming they haven’t already been assigned, in which case that is easier)
2. Find that outside source
3. Follow each step provided in your assignment.
–Start by summarizing both arguments. (Here’s a helpful post: https:///essay-writing-blog/how-to-summarize-an-article-the-smart-way/ )
–Synthesize the two by answering two questions: What’s similar about these arguments? What’s different about them?
–Add your response. Here’s another helpful post: https:///essay-writing-blog/how-to-write-a-good-essay-commentary/
Ultimately, the most grounded motivation to cancel capital punishment is a possibility to sentence a guiltless person. There is an example of Ray Krone, who was convicted of murder and spent 10 years in prison awaiting his innocence to be proved. Fortunately, the real murderer was found. Now Ray Krone is the Director of Training and Communications for meetings called Witness to Innocence, which are created to assist people that were sentenced to death for something they did not commit.
All in all, Albert Camus, a rival of the death penalty, wrote that people knew enough to say that the severe criminal deserve the hard labor for the rest of his (or her) life. However, people are not aware of the fact that this can be sufficient to “decree that he be shorn of his future”. In other words, all people are making amends because of the different heaviness whereas the others still cannot take other lives in revenge.